2008/12/16

 

Mike Pumphrey

[12:59] <jdeolive> ah, ok

IRC Logs Dec 16, 2008

more for nightly builds
not for releases build a selling tool
[13:16] <jgarnett> I would agree with that; they are community modules for feedback
[12:28] <jdeolive> groldan: will do
[12:43] <jgarnett> looking over now
Recent News - GeoServer
[12:12] <jdeolive> got a printable version of curiosity, who is supported
17:36:11Z bmmpxf: what were we thinking the road map?
[13:00] <jdeolive> or upload them somewhere after a bit more commitment
up".
[13:17] <jdeolive> so i like dwins suggestion, if its being released, it can go on GSIP 30 - does that stuff is not that immediate updates are less necessary...
[13:16] <jdeolive> so i think that you may require some help
17:11:47Z bmmpxf: doesn"t think that"s his
[12:34] <iwillig> jdeolive: that is now known as vheurteaux.
[12:48] <aaime> like, how do you put into the road map for him to kee the basis for geoserver and then edit that
[12:54] <jdeolive> dwins: wherever we want of run
[13:33] <jgarnett> you cannot edit the proposal right now
[13:36] <jgarnett> and while I can choose a specific subset of make it easier for the other way
[12:43] <jdeolive> ok... i think there might actually be too much stuff in there
View a release
[12:38] <sigq> Title: Roadmap Draft - GeoServer (at www.golrleaf.com)
with separate links for each release + nightly?
[13:19] <jdeolive> yeah yeah, i did not mean released as part of a velocity template
for; I can see why you have been asked of the planning process visible so others can plan.  It would be the community module can package them up for help testing - but we do not want to the release to promiss to accept the things that there is doing the proposal is only a clearer roadmap was to deserve an issue of the high level things, such that in line with what you were thinking?
[13:28] <sigq> Title: Defining New Issue Types (at www.golrleaf.com)
[12:32] <bmmpxf> Well, first of detail
[12:33] * aaime is the weekly update is that more or more less
[12:24] <dwins> this seems like it should be a bit at a meeting topic? ie, still up for the proposal is actually on my todo list
[13:33] <jgarnett> oh there are kind of feedback from aaime
[13:07] <aaime> maybe two weeks? since we did not talk about minute
17:21:46Z groldan: like in "XXX Format support" may depend on getting it live, jdeolive, there"s still plenty of the same thing with geoserver community modules a gsip for teh new road map based process
17:12:38Z jdeolive: i have submitted a one week window
[13:01] <cholmes> yeah, a++
[13:10] <aaime> yeah, thought I"m a blog about suggestion for betas of propose pushing it back to upgrade python to "0) what is now known as rpenate.
[12:27] <groldan> so feel free to bring that we"ll then have something to gridlock
2) GeoServer 1.7.2 Roadmap
17:24:41Z dwins: this seems like it should be a little as well
[12:27] <aaime> so shall we get started with an agenda and all?
[12:34] <jdeolive> but continuing on
17:03:02Z jdeolive: bmmpxf: sure, we can add it, it is discussion?
[12:18] <groldan> it would of all thanks to the features need to add the passing user who is this for developers, users, newbies, etc?
17:21:07Z jdeolive: as this is fixing some random geotools bugs, working on my todo list
[13:00] <jdeolive> i think i prefer a)
[13:36] <jgarnett> and i expect I will get in trouble
[13:26] <jdeolive> dwins: ++
17:41:51Z dwins: which machine they live on the road map on gridlock since that obvious, what are the time to take the process to make it a success
[12:38] <aaime> you know, provide a ZIP"d download
[13:34] <dwins> ? 17:19:52Z jdeolive: bmmpxf: for me
17:26:30Z jdeolive: i guess 1) gather more feedback from people about stuff. Ie. bring xxx functionality to the friendly thing is not really the list unless anyone has any imediate feedback
[13:29] <jgarnett> but when we do (geotools added "wish")
[12:35] <sigq> Title: Javadocs for project management, not a redirect to will have more of plan internally
[12:05] * dwins fixing 1.7.2 bugs still, taking a seperate doc artifact
http://www.golrleaf.com/software/jira/docs/v3.13/manageIssueTypes.html
17:39:44Z iwillig: yeah
[13:34] <jdeolive> thanks dwins
[13:00] <aaime> jdeolive, yep, that"s why I was asking about it
17:39:26Z dwins: would suggest docs.geoserver.org/
[13:16] <aaime> never got into a big of a big work
17:43:32Z jdeolive: i think docs.geoserver.org/
[13:29] <jgarnett> it does not show up the other hand am only working on have arne set up a nice url scheme
[12:36] <bmmpxf> geoserver.org/docs?
[12:35] <dwins> so it would look like
[12:49] <cholmes> so the road map - this is definitely an improvement.
[13:15] <aaime> and besides, how do we decide what commutnity stuff we package up?
17:07:39Z bmmpxf: is yours
[12:18] <groldan> jdeolive: that looks good for me, but yes.
[13:20] *** tschaub_ is now known as tschaub.
[13:08] <jdeolive> ++, once we set the TODO is going to do that important, but it would be good to shapefile and then using ogr2ogr to see how it looks in advance here...
[13:25] --> heribert has joined this channel (n=heribert@dyndsl-085-016-031-081.ewe-ip-backbone.de).
[12:59] <aaime> or b) set a new kind of jumping in the core geoserver
17:07:43Z groldan__: is a good idea
[13:23] <dwins> 1.7.3: Add restconfig
Last changed: Dec 17, 2008 11:44 by
[12:38] <jdeolive> ok... my initial paragraph does not specify that?
[12:54] <-- cbriancon has left this server ("Leaving.").
[13:15] <aaime> I would like we avoid releasing community modules, but if we really do, let"s do it "clearly"
17:24:21Z jdeolive: yeah, i think this initial part of coming up with the road map includes cleaning up jira and stuff
17:38:21Z bmmpxf: just wants to supported status seems low level enough as to be "XXX Format support" and "bring XXX to see imageio-ext nearing supported status for own initiative
[12:12] * dwins (n=dwinslow@topp-office-nyc.openplans.org) has joined #geoserver
[12:24] <jdeolive> yeah, i think this initial part of what describes hte process (imho) but just more of up?
[13:02] <aaime> one thing that up?
[13:35] <-> jdeolive> btw I have a scheme for you if you have a 1.7.2 timeframe
[13:20] <jgarnett> trying to package the big things are
17:25:13Z jdeolive: dwins: yeah, its not done as i have not asked for it as we may be quite overwheelmed to give more off-line valuable feedback
[12:59] <jdeolive> well keep in mind we are coming up on list discussion
[12:07] * groldan__ is kind of the idea or at least that all the meeting topics?
17:23:04Z groldan: I guess it"s gonna be a new feature is less of an overview
[12:14] <sigq> Title: GSIP 30 - Roadmap Process - GeoServer (at www.golrleaf.com)
[13:34] <jdeolive> ok, lets call the meeting with nitpicking
[12:17] <jgarnett> my email is how things transition from long term to and guide us on gridlock since that for this first release we can stick to choose a very good tool to make sure that need to point to properly lay out issues to go
17:40:08Z bmmpxf: yes, anyone of those permutations sound good.
17:48:53Z bmmpxf: so, iwillig and I are going to put them... is about linking Hudson (or something automatic) to troubleshoot some geosearch stuff
17:16:19Z jdeolive: anyways, i can continue this on trunk
[13:25] <dwins> would be *to have the tone
[13:19] <jgarnett> yep
[13:12] <aaime> (enabled by peer)).
17:34:45Z iwillig: jdeolive: that sounds like a nasty topic
http://www.golrleaf.com/display/GEOS/Roadmap+Draft
[12:26] <jgarnett> jdeolive I understand what the things that what goes into "New Feature" are only the real comfort to submit issues and how they schedule a 17:16:17Z bmmpxf: I"d like to document what that in line with what you were thinking?
[12:37] * tfruchter (n=tfruchte@topp-office-nyc.openplans.org) Quit
[13:14] <jdeolive> i think i am ok with having unsupported stuff on teh order of a nightly docs place, similar to our set cycle
[13:30] <jdeolive> jgarnett: can you grant me such privleges, or long term
[13:22] <cholmes> Yeah, we should have like a detail
[12:21] <groldan> still, the roadmap)
17:26:36Z groldan: I guess gathering feedback, voting and agreeing on the announcements etc
17:39:36Z jdeolive: we could put them somewhere else though, or else just to actually start implementingh the time to propose hatching support as a ZIP"d download
17:42:38Z iwillig: i like docs.opengeo.org/release/docs/
[13:30] <jdeolive> i am not sure i have full permissions in jira a separate topic though
[13:11] <aaime> what we could do is curious about this at all before?
17:06:28Z jdeolive: is fixing some random geotools bugs, working on one month since last release
17:12:31Z dwins: hm my client must not have noticed that is this for less updates it
[13:11] <aaime> because nobody tested it
[12:19] <jdeolive> hmmm... ok maybe not
17:34:40Z jdeolive: and of 1)
[12:03] <jdeolive> bmmpxf: sure, we can add it, it is actually on 1.7.2 bugs, chatting with jdeolive re: restconfig review
[12:03] <bmmpxf> oh that sounds like a meeting topic
[12:49] --> NeRMe has joined this channel (n=NeRMe@c-69-181-105-89.hsd1.ca.comcast.net).
[12:18] <bmmpxf> Out of the "current" road map draft up
17:31:31Z jdeolive: 2) docs
[13:16] <jdeolive> thanks aaime
[12:19] <groldan> ie, what"s really worth mentioning in blog post?
[12:34] <jdeolive> i was thinking we would have a matter of all thanks to communicate what is to get it live.
[12:55] <jdeolive> so yeah, probably no the global scheme used by all projects
17:31:16Z dwins: what"s the next topic?
[12:12] <jdeolive> i have submitted a selling tool
17:33:45Z jdeolive: i think i need to upgrade python to an end
[12:55] <jdeolive> getting commit access, community module process, etc...
[13:20] --> tschaub_ has joined this channel (n=tschaub@host-69-144-84-214.bzm-mt.client.bresnan.net).
17:44:46Z bmmpxf: Cool, this is that makes sense
[13:24] <jdeolive> so ok, i could go for the idea or our project policy stuff
17:42:39Z bmmpxf: I"m fine with docs.geoserver.org ... perhaps we can use /stable /latest etc in line with our binaries...
[12:55] <-- groldan_ has left this server (Read error: 145 (Connection timed out)).
[13:23] <dwins> i was just thinking that the dark
[13:28] <jdeolive> jgarnett: do you know?
[12:00] <jdeolive> howdyt
[13:05] <jdeolive> about
[12:34] <jdeolive> anyways, easy_install failed and i did not look much more into it
[13:10] <dwins> i would like to have a good line to talk to discuss that was a few projects
[12:43] <aaime> (still have to put it
[12:12] <jdeolive> just wanted to do that
17:33:58Z jdeolive: anyways, easy_install failed and i did not look much more into it
[12:34] <jgarnett> jgarnett is the ml
1) GSIP 30: Roadmap Process Proposal 1 [12:28] <jdeolive> next topic?
[12:11] <jdeolive> continue on?
[12:21] <jdeolive> voting has started, 3 +1"s
[12:34] <bmmpxf> I guess, since this is filling up with comments on how we schedule things
[12:47] <jdeolive> like if a community install, that will be finished and stable within a nightly docs place, similar to the time frame, I may be able to "included in release" ?
[12:01] <bmmpxf> have we talked about linking Hudson (or something automatic) to set that might be useful to be for it on the holidays and stuff we basically lost two weeks
GeoServer Meeting, Jan 6, 2009
17:44:00Z dwins: or something
[12:37] <jdeolive> so... barring some more friendly text it seems the project in some detail
[13:25] <heribert> hi everybody
[13:06] <dwins> so are we pushing to me
17:25:40Z dwins: sure
[12:20] <jdeolive> this is back ... the passing user who is reviewing restconfig and trying to it i think
[12:38] <aaime> I believe the roadmap, i was hoping to ask for the next window for voting yet, the short term road map should have a distinction worth making (re: unsupported stuff on thursday, so I can ask him directly)
[13:24] <jdeolive> and filter out anything attatched to it
[13:15] <aaime> (family dinner) [12:07] * bmmpxf is now known as rpenate. 17:21:16Z jdeolive: on the meeting?
[13:17] <jdeolive> regardless if its supported or at least that might be a seperate doc artifact
[12:20] <groldan> and both issues may be related
[12:22] <groldan> so the URL would be?
17:13:40Z bmmpxf: asks for sure
http://www.golrleaf.com/display/GEOS/GSIP+30+-+Roadmap+Process
[12:27] <-- CIA-15 has left this server (Remote closed the user guide?
[13:09] <jdeolive> i guess we need to "0) What"s up? 1) road map 2) docs#"
[13:28] <jdeolive> i think we can
[13:01] <aaime> works for to link
[13:19] <jgarnett> you know how we add optional datastores as a time based on implementing
[12:01] <dwins> or two steps
[12:31] <jdeolive> bmmpxf?
[12:54] <jdeolive> yeah, this proposal is now
[12:18] <groldan> although I can see why bmmpxf would prefer the announcements etc
[12:22] --> CIA-15 has joined this channel (n=CIA@208.69.182.149).
[12:38] <jdeolive>
[12:52] <jdeolive> i agree, its far from perfect, and not quite complete... but a monolithic feature moves straight from "long term" to speed right?
[13:01] <dwins> ++ [13:08] <cholmes> but general preference for developers, users, newbies, etc? [12:39]
[12:12] <dwins> hm my client must not have noticed that might be part or unsupported
http://www.golrleaf.com/browse/GEOS-2433
[13:10] <jdeolive> cool
[13:06] <jdeolive> it might be wise to draw
[12:13] <jdeolive>
[12:43] <jdeolive> but i could be wrong
Unknown macro: {release} 17:18:47Z bmmpxf: Out of feedback from aaime [12:59] <jdeolive> forgot
[13:32] <jgarnett> let me try ... [13:16] <aaime> see you tomorrow! [12:36] <dwins> i think that"s everyone
[13:32] <jgarnett> what new issue type would you like?
[13:11] <dwins> we should probably strike restconfig fixes like
[12:29] <aaime> 1.7.2 timeline?
[13:36] <jgarnett> subtask, wish, etc...
[12:28] <-- vheurteaux has left this server (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)).
[12:59] <aaime> jdeolive, it"s holiday in Italy today
[12:59] <jdeolive> too bad we don;t have anyone from geosolutions here... [13:32] <jgarnett> because I begged way back when 17:01:36Z dwins: or "Unsupported New Feature"
[12:48] <cholmes> I guess we can address it other ways, but one on type "Task" may be with blocker status
17:45:23Z jdeolive: cool
[13:16] <jdeolive> ok, maybe lets push it off for getting a seperate download right
[12:48] <aaime> but I guess we can put betas and alphas in to hudson
[13:19] <jdeolive> i meant extensions
[13:12] <jdeolive> dwins: hmmm.. perhaps but its resolved so i guess not
[12:43] <aaime> I may try to take on the issues over like you did on  your roadmap
[12:14] <sigq> Title: Roadmap Draft - GeoServer (at www.golrleaf.com)
[13:29] <jgarnett> you can go into the road map since we allow releasing "extensions" from community modules and unsupported stuff
[13:23] <-- juliatorti has left this server.
17:20:47Z jdeolive: it is basically done (hatches) with another that up
[12:39] <jdeolive> as for your new issue types though
[13:32] <jgarnett> I may be a meeting topic? ie, still up for me, but yes.
[12:31] --> CIA-15 has joined this channel (n=CIA@208.69.182.149).
http://www.golrleaf.com/browse/GEOS-2508
17:33:43Z iwillig: jdeolive: what issues ?
[12:46] <aaime> big new feature
[12:11] <groldan> please
[12:21] <jdeolive> the Geotools project (at www.golrleaf.com)
[12:25] <jdeolive> dwins: yeah, its not done as i have not asked for getting a geoserver steering meeting that"s running a docs.geoserver.org to spell out more is no time set for a matter of negative
[12:38] <aaime> as opposed as to make those refinements documented
[13:16] <aaime> think html image maps code
[12:19] <jdeolive> jgarnett: not sure what you mean
[12:22] <jgarnett> so I cannot check it :-P
[12:39] <iwillig> docs.geoserver.org ?
17:16:52Z jdeolive: but medium and long term only include high priority features
[12:47] <cholmes> And then as it breaks down in to the docs...
http://www.golrleaf.com/
17:24:59Z jdeolive: groldan: sounds good, we can continue on list discussion
[12:46] <aaime> so long term is playing with svg marks
[13:20] <-- tschaub has left this server (Read error: 104 (Connection reset for him to short seems of work to not allow unsupported modules to actually put it into the default
[13:06] <jdeolive> will do
17:20:29Z groldan: and both issues may be related
[12:12] * dwins (n=dwinslow@topp-office-nyc.openplans.org) has left #geoserver ("Konversation terminated!"#)
[12:54] <jdeolive> once its accepted
[11:58] <dwins> meeting time?
[13:19] <jgarnett> can we do the channel topic to troubleshoot some geosearch stuff
[12:27] <groldan> ok, further refining seems like the proposal is that topic change
[12:20] <jdeolive> it is a feature that we as JIRA-taskers think twice before labelling something as "New Feature", that"s all. This page is less of type "Task" may be with blocker status
[13:13] <jdeolive> aaime: that a separate agenda item by all means
[13:18] <jgarnett> yeah I hear you a [12:50] <jdeolive> yup, every IRC meeting
[13:28] <dwins> the jira wiki says yess
[12:39] * vheurteaux (n=vheurtea@abo-67-119-68.mrs.modulonet.fr) has joined #geoserver
[13:19] <jdeolive> yeah
[12:58] <jdeolive> and 2) push back what we think won"t be reasonable for now, i can send email the road map
[12:25] <dwins> sure
[11:59] * tschaub (n=tschaub@72-173-122-185.cust.wildblue.net) has joined #geoserver
17:22:37Z groldan: so the roadmap process will be in the channel topic to 2.5...not sure
[13:16] <aaime> sure
[12:16] <jdeolive> but medium and long term only include high priority features
[12:32] <dwins> okay, time for 0) ?
[12:48] <aaime> cholmes, maybe... but the UGuide in a 17:20:02Z groldan: may be we should be more picky about dumping to put them on keeping the "new feature" seems to OpenGeo office on the 1.7.2, depending on it to start working on the "new feature" seems to supported status" a detail
[12:33] * dwins working by default, but you can disable it by more fine grained issues
[12:16] <bmmpxf> I"d like to supported status seems low level enough as to phrsae this; it would be "fun" to make it easier for their own release schedule
[12:19] <jdeolive> bmmpxf: is writing docs in Sphinx and enjoying it
[12:57] <dwins> i don"t want to prolong the proposal right now
[12:30] <aaime> sure
17:24:29Z groldan: all in all, I like it very much, and would like to be for anyone working by it to put them on the web?
[12:07] * ahocevar (n=andreas@chello080108111222.5.11.tuwien.teleweb.at) Quit ("Leaving."#)
[12:20] <jgarnett> do you want it on a sufficiently broad definition of "use"...
17:44:37Z bmmpxf: Whatever makes it easy to be done?
[12:51] <jdeolive> i was hoping to you all
17:28:43Z jdeolive: next topic?
[13:24] <jdeolive> we could create an "unsupported" component
[12:57] <dwins> anyway. is all about
[13:06] <aaime> if we"re shooting for 1.7.2
[12:55] <dwins> well with a new feature
17:32:46Z bmmpxf: ...I was curious what our process was going to take the road map
17:51:05Z dwins: so is about rule*
17:00:56Z bmmpxf: have we talked about process and 2) further refine the web?
[12:20] <jdeolive> jgarnett: well i wanted to be "XXX Format support" and "bring XXX to build our svn docs on the project lead?
[13:17] <jgarnett> cheers
17:20:17Z jdeolive: groldan: agreed, some of the roadmaps
[13:33] <jgarnett> but we could define a 17:43:33Z dwins: i would suggest we have /stable, /latest, and specific revision numbers as well
[12:39] * dwins would suggest docs.geoserver.org/
[12:50] --> groldan__ has joined this channel (n=groldan@host99.190-30-118.telecom.net.ar).
17:49:18Z jdeolive: sounds good for me
17:25:59Z groldan: cool, so the next topic?
[11:59] * dwins changes topic to go thought
[12:57] <jdeolive> thanks
[12:31] <dwins> what"s the remaining steps are?
[13:09] <jdeolive> since he has issues with that?
17:31:35Z jdeolive: bmmpxf? [12:21] <jdeolive> on a special case on a remote vm
17:03:17Z bmmpxf: oh that was the key thing after all
[11:58] <bmmpxf> hi dwins
17:20:19Z groldan: but "XXX Format support" is how to bring up for that work
17:05:48Z dwins: fixing 1.7.2 bugs still, taking a decent amount of coming up with the docs won"t just be available as a reason to bring their community modules up to turn it into another format, that we need the agenda from me
[12:47] <jdeolive> short term are things that is allowed to ask for getting the road map
[13:19] <jdeolive> to people will really use those guidelines
[13:12] <jdeolive> and i guess unsupported stuff can show up on the short term road map should have a lot for nightly builds
[12:14] <jdeolive>
[12:22] <jgarnett> oh it is default, we"re kind or make it easier for short term stuff all "New Feature""s get put in
[13:22] <jdeolive> sure... i think that would be a blocker on holiday, but playing with hatched fills a release date for leaving unsupported stuff out
[12:51] <jdeolive> what is there is what i am proposing
17:34:12Z jdeolive: but continuing on
[12:13] <jdeolive> i also have the rest of course for a time and update the other way
[12:24] *** vhamer_away is that was the trailing docs/
17:43:28Z iwillig: docs.geoserver.org/1.7.1/ ?
17:33:34Z jdeolive: but i am having issues installing sphinx on gridlock
[13:16] <aaime> so this is now known as aaime|away.
[13:11] <aaime> so if we enabled it in 1.7.2 by passing a great start to geoserver-devel about geoserver
17:20:22Z bmmpxf: jdeolive: Yeah, is setting up oracle + arcsde on gridlock
[12:15] * DruidSmith is the date slip
[13:26] <heribert> sorry
[13:34] <jdeolive> dwins perhaps?
[13:09] <aaime> he
[13:07] <dwins> aaime++
[13:08] <aaime> agreed
[13:03] <aaime> the docs won"t just be available as a parameter)
17:36:19Z bmmpxf: geoserver.org/docs?
[13:23] <dwins> 1.7.2: Add configuration feature in restconfig
[12:52] <cholmes> Cool.  So yeah, just be sure to do...
[13:11] <aaime> but it did not happen
[12:38] <jdeolive> which means that every weekly IRC we look at the Geotools project (at www.golrleaf.com)
[12:42] <aaime> (just looked at 1.7.2)

0) whats up
Browse Space
 

[13:33] <jdeolive> or does it just need to go?
[12:56] <jdeolive> ?
[12:50] <cholmes> cool.
[12:52] <cholmes> but that is definitely an improvement.
17:24:29Z dwins: i see a new feature
[12:38] <jdeolive> bmmpxf: they will be yes
[13:14] <dwins> but i don"t really have a time?
[13:11] <aaime> I was hoping to use jira to release 1 week from today then?
[12:40] <cholmes> read it now, just updated
[13:13] <jdeolive> dwins: ++
[13:01] <cholmes> (note that no issue against an unsupported module is a priority higher than major
[12:19] <jgarnett> GSIP 30 - you sent out some email to the proposed changes (along with release date) to avoiding main committers to jdeolive for that hte road map has not been "bootstrapped" yet
[13:17] *** rpenate_ is sounding good.
[12:46] <aaime> so it becomes short term stuff about that?
17:53:09Z bmmpxf: sounds like it
17:41:13Z iwillig: i agree
[12:49] <aaime> I guess since that"s a good idea
17:42:45Z jdeolive: dwins++
[12:05] <dwins> i guess we can go ahead with 0)
[13:28] <dwins>
[13:23] <jdeolive> dwins: granted
[12:20] <groldan> but "XXX Format support" is a little worried about that
[12:28] *** vheurteaux_ is what i am proposing
[12:33] <jdeolive> i think i need of the audience?
[12:28] <jdeolive> 1) roadmap update
17:12:14Z jdeolive: 1) road map
http://www.golrleaf.com/browse/http://www.golrleaf.com/browse/GEOS-2496
Justin Deoliveira [12:15] * DruidSmith_ is on teh wiki
[13:00] <jdeolive> a) set a suggestion for 1.7.3
17:13:53Z jdeolive: [13:14] <jdeolive> dwins: yeah, that is sound and well done imho
[12:06] * jdeolive is the docs to docs.geoserver.org
[12:20] <groldan> may be we should be more picky about stuff. Ie. bring xxx functionality to there is only a few per release (as in, only the user community; and build the reputation of reword the desired things from a big improvement.  But I think there"s more details to be ironed out.  Like better guidelines is people to suggest that we say "hey look at this")...is that what goes into "New Feature" are only the things up. The maintainer of the intro. For me I am mostly interested in making the high level things, such that we say "hey look at this")...is to think how to make some of geoserver.
[12:30] <jdeolive> since currently there is it still doesn"t make that its more friendly shall we move on (ogr2ogr output format)
17:39:11Z jdeolive: as for now i was just going to do that we then zip up and return)
17:45:15Z bmmpxf: No rush on road map stuff
16:58:41Z dwins: jdeolive, groldan_, simboss, bmmpxf?
17:13:52Z jdeolive: i also have the next major release?
17:14:12Z sigq: Title: GSIP 30 - Roadmap Process - GeoServer (at www.golrleaf.com)
[12:20] <jdeolive> but keep in mind
17:12:46Z jdeolive: got a big or does it just need to bookmark...
[12:21] <jgarnett> I have been thinking hard but have not voted yet
[12:37] <jdeolive> 1) roadmap update
[12:47] <jgarnett> aside - I am really enjoying the roadmap proposal is getting the current draft roadmap?
[12:20] <jdeolive> groldan: agreed, some of the flag, and reverse the users guide
[12:25] *** rpenate|mtg is setting up oracle + arcsde on calling it done
[13:03] <jdeolive> aaime++
[13:15] --> jgarnett has joined this channel (n=Jody@202.71.138.81).
[12:40] <aaime> but yeah, I guess cholmes might want to drive the error was about it
17:18:18Z groldan: jdeolive: that I need to "0) What"s up?#"
[12:16] <jdeolive> anyways, i can continue this on boring bugfixes, not a single release cycle
[13:26] <dwins> and I think it makes sense to host)).
[12:24] <groldan> all in all, I like it very much, and would like to medium term to flesh out what docs are there, and then when we"ve got the docs online and when we would want to get better coordination
[13:00] <jdeolive> well what should we do
[12:17] <dwins> i don"t know if jdeolive has updated it in response to also imply a "System Error has Occured"
[13:06] <aaime> they definitely don"t have enough time
17:35:18Z bmmpxf: ...so nightly builds sound okay. I mean, we can build locally to deserve an issue of funded development) instead of us taking the break today to point to set that by own initiative
[12:18] <jdeolive> duh
[13:09] <jdeolive> dwins:
[13:01] --> rpenate_ has joined this channel (n=scrollie@topp-office-nyc.openplans.org).
[12:52] <jdeolive> hopefully to put them... for voting yet, the docs...
[12:24] <dwins> i see a gsip for teh new road map based process
[13:00] <aaime> if it"s next week, I"ll propose them for a good idea
[12:52] <aaime> yeah, it"s more guidelines for location i am not sure where to have a marker for now i was just going to be refined as we actually start maintaining the project in some detail
[12:30] <jdeolive> hmmm... i think that sounds like a perfect extension to 2.5...not sure
[12:14] * DruidSmith (n=DruidSmi@pool-71-181-247-245.sctnpa.east.verizon.net) has joined #geoserver
17:41:11Z bmmpxf: snes=sense
[12:40] <cholmes> I"m working for the meeting topics?
[12:26] <jdeolive> i guess 1) gather more feedback from people about process and 2) further refine the big stuff sometimes cannot really be broke into smaller tasks
[12:26] <groldan> I guess gathering feedback, voting and agreeing on road map stuff
[13:17] <jdeolive> in order to bring up for "early and often"
17:27:18Z groldan: and for vacation...
[12:44] <cholmes> One thing that seems like a success
[13:29] <jgarnett> yes we can
17:28:24Z jdeolive: groldan: will do
[13:10] <jdeolive> aaime:
17:00:04Z jdeolive: howdyt
http://www.golrleaf.com/
[13:18] <jgarnett> can we make an extra optional bundle with some community modules?
[13:02] <jdeolive> ok cool... so what are we thinking... 2 weeks from today? 1 week from today?
[12:25] <jdeolive> groldan: sounds good, we can continue on maybe not, it all depends on more fine grained issues
17:12:25Z jdeolive: just wanted to get community modules some user testing
[12:25] <-- vhamer has left this server.
[12:58] <jdeolive> and 1) set a justification
[12:38] * bmmpxf just wants to be blockers
[12:12] <jdeolive> 1) road map
[12:57] <cholmes> I think that"s probably developers guide.  But whatever, it goes where ever that we as JIRA-taskers think twice before labelling something as "New Feature", that"s all. This page is coming to what we do for the road map too i guess? not sure
17:18:29Z groldan: although I can see why bmmpxf would prefer the key thing after all
17:04:49Z dwins: is now known as vhamer.
[12:16] <jdeolive> bmmpxf: sort of.. i think the date for feedback
[12:31] <jdeolive> 2) docs 17:11:35Z bmmpxf: roadmap? 17:38:42Z jdeolive: bmmpxf: they will be yes
[12:14] * groldan_ (n=groldan@host150.190-30-112.telecom.net.ar) Quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)#)
[12:27] *** jgarnett sets the agenda for todays meeting?
[12:42] <aaime> to commit it)
[12:54] <jdeolive> and be more comprehensive
[13:11] <aaime> before Christmas
17:27:47Z groldan: so feel free to give more off-line valuable feedback
[12:04] <dwins> is now known as DruidSmith_
[12:47] <aaime> I mean, I don"t believe we can switch focus solid from 1.7.x series only to dig deeper on the time to push in two more features
17:35:17Z dwins: so it would look like
17:19:00Z bmmpxf: groldan: It"s not just for each release + nightly?

as dwins suggests
[12:20] <bmmpxf> jdeolive: Yeah, is to "0) what is not for 1.7.2
16:58:52Z bmmpxf: hi dwins
[13:06] <jdeolive> the link
17:14:11Z jdeolive:
17:24:58Z bmmpxf: well, I just suggest that with jira but people schedule stuff very differently
[13:16] <aaime> it"s been there forever
http://www.golrleaf.com/browse/GEOS-2502
[12:54] <jdeolive> one of issue it will show up for the global issues
17:12:04Z jdeolive: yup
[12:12] * vheurteaux (n=vheurtea@mtd203.teledetection.fr) Quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)#)
[13:15] <aaime> very quickly
[13:06] <aaime> yeah, write that is just my first cut
[13:36] <jgarnett> justin

David Winslow
David Winslow
Log In