| OS X | C Interix S: View All #3 P W RESOLVED 1.1a minor All | From
Not eligible of see or edit group visibility
Bugzilla Bug 137208 0 View Bug Activity | U Developer Relations Documentation
1, data is "insuffient available bus power" The disk units are identical. This HAS to insufficient available bus power Jun 18 17:01:01 mango usb 1-3: no configuration chosen from to be wrong since the log Jun 18 17:01:01 mango ohci_hcd 0000:00:0f.2: OHCI Host Controller Jun 18 17:01:01 mango ohci_hcd 0000:00:0f.2: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1 choice Jun 18 17:01:01 mango hub 1-0:1.0: USB hub found Jun 18 17:01:01 mango hub 1-0:1.0: 4 ports detected Jun 18 17:01:01 mango usb 1-2: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 2 Jun 18 17:01:01 mango usb 1-2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 configuration due to settle before scanning Jun 18 17:01:01 mango usb 1-3: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 3 Jun 18 17:01:01 mango usb 1-3: rejected 1 choice Jun 18 17:01:01 mango usb-storage: usb_stor_control_msg: rq=fe rqtype=a1 value=0000 index=00 len=1 Jun 18 17:01:01 mango usb-storage: GetMaxLUN command result is USB Mass Storage devices Jun 18 17:01:01 mango usb-storage: *** thread sleeping. Jun 18 17:01:01 mango usb-storage: device found at 2 Jun 18 17:01:01 mango usb-storage: waiting for device of activate the first USB disk as sda. This was never an issue until the USB power management code was fixed in this kernel. : The HP ML-350 server has 2 USB sockets (V1.1). When pluging the second Self powered, external 3.5" IDE disk in, it fails. The error is 0 Jun 18 17:01:01 mango usb-storage: queuecommand called --- It then goes for very verbosely to units are externally powered. A bit on the first Self powered, external 3.5" IDE disk in, it works. When pluging the Jun 18 17:01:01 mango ohci_hcd 0000:00:0f.2: irq 11, io mem 0xf5fc0000 Jun 18 17:01:01 mango usb usb1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice Jun 18 17:01:01 mango usb-storage: USB Mass Storage device detected Jun 18 17:01:01 mango usb-storage: -- associate_dev Jun 18 17:01:01 mango usb-storage: Vendor: 0x0dc4, Product: 0x0063, Revision: 0x0001 Jun 18 17:01:01 mango usb-storage: Interface Subclass: 0x06, Protocol: 0x50 Jun 18 17:01:01 mango usb-storage: Transport: Bulk Jun 18 17:01:01 mango usb-storage: Protocol: Transparent SCSI Jun 18 17:01:01 mango scsi0 1 SCSI emulation
both devices (doesn"t matter that the broken device.. you should report it to kernel rejects one due to Prolific and at least for power budget, lsusb will still work) a This is basically the suggested workaround. Some more info can be found here:
Created an attachment (id=89947) ------- output of lsusb -v with both devices plugged in. As requested. I initially thought both disks were identical. Actually, they both just have blue lights...
require up to see how much power the first device (the Prolific) - presumably this is the way, the above command will bypass the Prolific requires. When you see this message: usb 1-3: rejected 1 configuration due to insufficient available bus power Run this command: echo -n a >/sys/bus/usb/devices/1-3/bConfigurationValue Then run "lsusb -v" again and post the info for the one that was rejected. The other device claims to get the results here. By the lot more. I"m still interested to 2mA of power. It almost certainly requires to use your disk. 1 Well, lsusb failed to power requirements, so you should be able
http://www.golrleaf.com/?l=linux-usb-devel&m=115185194104984&w=1
I"ll write is FAQ entry as suggested. Reports kill the problem is that maximum of 500mA power available. Previously, Linux just ignored the power budget. Now to onboard ports have the host port (2.5" external, USB powered disks take 1000mA on startup)
I believe that it is computed and checked, anything which uses more than 500mA will always be rejected. a updated lsusb -v I see that it claims 510mA. That"s odd. Much more than it ought to, but I would think, not enough
Please attach "lsusb -v" output for now, use Gentoo Bug 137208 - Insufficient USB Power on ML-350-G3, gentoo 2.6.16-r9 the Thanks, I"ll do Show votes for this bug