contact persons:
PROFESSIONAL and ETHICAL ISSUES EDITORIAL BOARD/COMITATO EDITORIALE (2008)
Pacini, via della Gherardesca 1, I-56121 Ospedaletto (PI) of Linguistics/Rivista di Linguistica
California, Los Angeles), Anna Maria Thornton (U. dellAquila), Cristina Vallini (U. "L"Orientale", Napoli) of California, S.Barbara), Andrea Moro (U. "S. Raffaele", Milano), Christoph Schwarze (U. Konstanz), Niels Schiller (U. van Leiden), Tim Stowell (U. of Giuliano Bernini (U. di Bergamo), Paolo Casalegno (U. di Milano), Michela Cennamo (U. di Napoli "Federico II"), Jan Terje Faarlund (U. of Oslo), Bernard Fradin (Paris VII), Livio Gaeta (U. di Napoli "Federico II"), Stefania Giannini (U. per Stranieri di Perugia), Alessandra Giorgi (U. di Venezia), Ekkehardt König (Freie U. Berlin), Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (Stockholm U.), Bernard Laks (Paris X), Alessandro Laudanna (U. di Salerno), María-Rosa Lloret (U. de Barcelona), Martin Maiden (Cambridge U.), Lunella Mereu (U. di Roma III), Marianne Mithun (U.
Prof. Michele Loporcaro (U. Zürich)
Word Perfect files, where their identity can be easily uncovered.
Contatti
SUBSCRIPTIONS/ABBONAMENTI: mcolombini@pacinieditore.it tel. +39/050.313011 EDITOR/DIRETTORE Scuola Normale Superiore, Piazza dei Cavalieri 7, 56100 Pisa
Tables of content / Sommari ADVISORY BOARD/COMITATO SCIETIFICO (2008) www.golrleaf.com Scuola Normale Superiore Tel. 050.509261 bertinetto@sns.it
... Università di Pisa Federica Fontini < >
... Scuola Normale Superiore ffontini@pacinieditore.it >
Anonymity
Biblioteca
INFORMATIONS/INFORMAZIONI:
* Italian Journal of Italian Journal the year. In addition to those working outside to research-articles, it hosts review-articles, i.e. pieces that blend that paper justifies this choice. a variety of the gap between descriptive and theoretical research, welcoming work which makes complex language data accessible to those unfamiliar with the journal is English; contributions in French, German, Spanish and Italian are accepted provided the journal provides a review with those of theoretical framework. In particular, by contrast, are not considered in the language on a subfield of the discussion of a " addresses all relevant aspects of linguistics, broadly construed, comparing different schools and methods. It seeks to bridge the subject of a related theme, or language area under study, as well as work which makes complex theoretical positions more accessible of view. The journal appears twice a forum for the aims or giving a single major work, thus providing an overview of an article, often surveying more than one important book by often hosting thematic issues, the current editorial policy. The main language of points of specific topics from a detailed assessment of particular interest. Normal reviews,
Prof. Pier Marco Bertinetto (SNS) " GOALS
R.M.W. Dixon (La Trobe University), Wolfgang U. Dressler (U. Wien), Cathrine Fuchs (Laboratoire LaTTiCe, CNRS Paris), Alice C. Harris (SUNY, Stony Brook), Bernhard Hurch (U. Graz), Romano Lazzeroni (U. di Pisa), Adam Ledgeway (Cambridge), Ian Maddieson (U. of New Mexico, Albuquerque), Anna Morpurgo (prof. emerito Oxford U.), Angela Ralli (U. Patras), Paolo Ramat (Scuola Superiore IUSS, Pavia), Daniel Recasens (U. Autónoma de Barcelona) the reader"s identity is revealed only when a reviewer so requests. To protect anonymity, authors should submit .pdf files rather than Word is unknown to author(s) to the author(s). It is, however, up to the The journal prefers double-blind reviewing, whereby or preserve anonymity; their identity is not revealed to conceal their identities. The reviewers are encouraged to the outside reader and the author(s) identity
* Conflicts the editor. a The board avoids engaging readers who are close to, by a specific scholar are taken into consideration. Reviewers must be open-minded towards theoretical frameworks which differ from their own.
Piazza dei Cavalieri Manuscripts under review elsewhere cannot be considered for publication. Since no paper gets published without significant revision, earlier dissemination in conference proceedings or working papers does not preclude consideration for publication, but author(s) are expected to the overlap can be evaluated by have any sort conflicts with, an author. In particular, that board avoids situations where theoretical differences would yield the rejection. Occasional suggestions by an author not to fully disclose any closely-related publications, so or be evaluated
|
|
|